Hi!please I got a little exclamation to do, I submited some scans yesterday, and the ones that I was sure that they will be accepted were rejected, (Rejection reason : already existing into the gallery), but my scans were clearer, (the original ones were cuted in the middle by a line), mine were clear, selfscanned and its resolution were close to the original scans in the gallery, and also I got paper reduction (2scans -> -200papers)
I already precised that my scans are already existing and they are cleaner (don't have line in the middle) when I submited them, here are the original scans and my resolutions :



my scan resolution : 2161x3603



my scan resolution : 2542x3603

Can you precise the scan rejection please ?

but my scans were clearer, (the original ones were cuted in the middle by a line)

The fold lines are insignificant and can be easily cleaned. Quality of existing scan is also good. As such, the larger version stays. Unless you are able to scan the same image at the same resolution size (or larger) with a much better quality than the existing one right now, the existing images will remain as it is.

...and its resolution were close to the original scans in the gallery

Tonagura (Gallery): 3846 x 5500px
Tonagura (your ver.): 2161x3603px <- as you claimed

Mai Otome (Gallery): 3472 x 4961px
Mai Otome (your ver.): 2542x3603px <- as you claimed

Totally far from close.

Well, as I know, complete scans (no lines, non assembled page, non cropped image ) have the priority to be in the gallery, it's not the first time I submitted a complete scan that I found in the gallery (with higher resolution but incomplete), and it's always accepted, with same resolution rapport like these 2 ones...

Dias

Mai Otome (Gallery): 3472 x 4961px Mai Otome (your ver.): 2542x3603px <- as you claimed Totally far from close.

Also, as I know, a far difference is for exemple 5000 and 1600, that's what a great administrator told me, thanks to her by the way, ^nat, when I need her she helps me all the time...

So, sorry but I don't agree with you... if my scans are rejected, it's not for the reason that you gave me, not because "The fold lines are insignificant and can be easily cleaned."

I'm sorry you took what I said before literally, I was only providing an example of a size difference. The difference between 3846 x 5500px and 2161x3603px is significant. What isn't significant is the size difference between 2300 px in height and 2500 px, when the slightly larger or smaller one also includes removal of creases etc and that was the height/submission size of most of the scans you were submitting so that was what I was explaining.

If you take some time to read the FAQ you'll have a better understanding of the rules than you would after a few targeted questions you've been asking on specific scans.