__THISRES__81653.jpg "Fly... by °Phill 1 month 4 hours ago")
why this one rejected..
1 Page: [ 1 ]
I dunno what's wrong with this..do you know why??
http://img183.imageshack.us/img183/3130/gtoji9.jpg
http://img183.imageshack.us/img183/3130/gtoji9.jpg
+I Was Born Not To SOCIALIZE+
~ Rukawa11is a lieutenant of Soul Society Group
What did the rejection notice say?
Here it is...
The wallpaper you have uploaded does not meet the quality standards set by our guide. Please post your wallpaper in the session zero forum for feedback on how to improve your wall by other wallpaper artists.
shinn is the one who wrote this...
The wallpaper you have uploaded does not meet the quality standards set by our guide. Please post your wallpaper in the session zero forum for feedback on how to improve your wall by other wallpaper artists.
shinn is the one who wrote this...
+I Was Born Not To SOCIALIZE+
~ Rukawa11is a lieutenant of Soul Society Group
The first item I notice is that the drop shadow on the logo is being cut off on the bottom and left sides, like it is in a box. Also, if you're going to use a logo, why cut off the top of the logo? Try bringing it down or placing it somewhere else on the wall. You may also want to shrink it a bit. The vector looks great and I can't find anything wrong with it.
I agree with ram, and also the outlines, i think there should be outlines on the finger part..and the way you put the black shadow, i think you must fix it..:)
good luck
good luck
I would say it's probably because of two things here. One being the logo at the top. It gets cut off in a strange way that seems like just a craftsmanship error. The other thing that appears to be an issue is the simplicity of the wallpaper. It may not quite be considered your own work because it looks like a one-tone background with a live trace layed over it. For most people, this involves about 5 minutes worth of work and a scan. That could easily be the reasoning behind rejection, but I'm not exactly the expert here.
techmanI would say it's probably because of two things here. One being the logo at the top. It gets cut off in a strange way that seems like just a craftsmanship error. The other thing that appears to be an issue is the simplicity of the wallpaper. It may not quite be considered your own work because it looks like a one-tone background with a live trace layed over it. For most people, this involves about 5 minutes worth of work and a scan. That could easily be the reasoning behind rejection, but I'm not exactly the expert here.
I think its a vector, am I wrong?
Haha if it's ShiNN then he probably thinks it's too simple.
i would make GTO smoother.
also below the logo, the shadow? gets cut off weirdly.
he might've wanted a bit more than just a plain vector+text. because afterall, there was an annoucement on rejecting walls like that. although recently, there has been quite alot of those.
maybe make the smoke another color or something.... white?
I'm not sure, but I hope I helped.
i would make GTO smoother.
also below the logo, the shadow? gets cut off weirdly.
he might've wanted a bit more than just a plain vector+text. because afterall, there was an annoucement on rejecting walls like that. although recently, there has been quite alot of those.
maybe make the smoke another color or something.... white?
I'm not sure, but I hope I helped.
I think its a vector, am I wrong?[/quote]
yah!
it's fully vector..
+I Was Born Not To SOCIALIZE+
~ Rukawa11is a lieutenant of Soul Society Group
Well, being that it is a vector I still stand by my original post here:
You should maybe give some thought to adding a few elements to it to create some interesting movement and really consider dropping that logo so that the whole thing is part of the wallpaper. I think it would help create an interesting sense of movement throughout the entire wallpaper and bump up the quality quite a bit.
myselfI would say it's probably because of two things here. One being the logo at the top. It gets cut off in a strange way that seems like just a craftsmanship error. The other thing that appears to be an issue is the simplicity of the wallpaper. It may not quite be considered your own work because it looks like a one-tone background with a live trace layed over it. For most people, this involves about 5 minutes worth of work and a scan. That could easily be the reasoning behind rejection, but I'm not exactly the expert here.
You should maybe give some thought to adding a few elements to it to create some interesting movement and really consider dropping that logo so that the whole thing is part of the wallpaper. I think it would help create an interesting sense of movement throughout the entire wallpaper and bump up the quality quite a bit.
1 Page: [ 1 ]