__THISRES__86808.jpg "What Exactly Is Pink? by °dalarty 3 weeks 5 hours ago")
Time travelling
I think that it can be possible to time travel
but maybe another 1000 or 3000 years later when fling cars and al that were made
actually that would kinda be cool
if i live up to that stage
making a time machine is pretty high tec
n it probably take a few years to finish it
n find wat they need
n try it out if it works
n they hav to find the money
add al that together that would take forever
i think...
but maybe another 1000 or 3000 years later when fling cars and al that were made
actually that would kinda be cool
if i live up to that stage
making a time machine is pretty high tec
n it probably take a few years to finish it
n find wat they need
n try it out if it works
n they hav to find the money
add al that together that would take forever
i think...
6 months 2 weeks ago
In my opinion, time traveling is not Impossible.
You say, why I went and used ‘not impossible’, that is ‘negative’ form instead of ‘possible’, ‘positive’ form?
Because, there’s still many difficulties in this matter. At least, some of them had been pinned out by quantum physics:
In order to travel across time, one must accelerate the vessel to the point near (a friction) of speed of light. With that, the ‘time fabric’ around that vessel will be slowed (the ‘you will be younger than your twin bro in Earth’ crap), and ultimately, when the vessel EXCEEDS the speed of light, you will be able to travel freely, roaming time as your backyard…
…or so they say.
Breaking the continuum of time-space is not as easy as they predicted. Because the continuum itself has granted ‘Existence’.
Don’t know what I meant? Let me explain in less scientific way:
Imagine you have a clock. A working-well, ticking clock. What color, is not important; and analog is recommended.
When you opened the glass cover, and put your finger in the track of the ticking hand, what will happen?
It will stop. Yes, it may be still trying to tick, but your hand will block the way.
The same will happen with electrons, swirling inside of the atom. When they’re subjected to forced acceleration, they tends to gather the force as weight.
In other words, just as [Amrod] described, this weight made the atom-and ultimately matter that composed by them heavier. And this calls for more energy for propelling the vessel.
An unending loophole.
Yet, that is just one problem for the so-called ‘time explolers’. The second thing that matter is the rigidity of human bodies.
When subjected to acceleration equals to more than 2 times of Earth gravitation, most of people will pass out because of lack of blood supply to their brains. However, when trained (as in NASA’s astronauts) human body will tolerate up to 3 times G.
What will happen to human, when their body accelerated near the speed of light?
…let me calculate…the G will equals unending loophole of the gross weight of the vessel times the acceleration times….
…in short, human bodies-will end as a paste of organic matter after the process. That is, if the vessel itself still intact.
The atoms inside of a matter vibrates. And if subjected to external energy source, they will absorb it and vibrates more.
So what will happened when this atoms are given enough energy to shake off the link between them? Of course, the formation will break down. So will the vessel we’re using; even with the state-of-art shielding technique (of course, it is a different matter when you’re using photon—concentrated power of light—as the shield since they are just energy; they would not gain mass-or so I thought.)
Another way that had been made in attempt of time-traveling is to use blackholes: this sweet babes will draw you in near the speed of light, so you won’t need so much energy.
But the drawback is still the same: human bodies can’t hold that much acceleration. What’s more; the vessel will need extra power to escape the gravitional pull when you have succeeded to travel into past-at maximum, the time that blackhole was formed (you can’t go to the future using this method).
The last problem of the ‘time-traveling’ is the ‘Butterfly Effect’. Who knows what will happen in the future when some Geiger counter triggered the trap? Will the cat be killed, or not? Or what will happened when someone from the future assassinated Hitler?
Maybe, the Nazis will reign until now. Or they will nuke the earth, rendering it unhabitable.
Who knows? Even until now, human beings made parrarel universe when they’re choosing their socks: the black or the grey one? Which foot will I wear them first?
Yes, it is not impossible for humans to leap across the time. Maybe 200, maybe 300 years for now.
But now, we’re living in the ‘Present’. Not the Past, not the Future. Because the ‘Now’ we’re living in is determined by us. Weeping over Past or longing for unclear Future will lead us nowhere.
…at least, it is what my principle.
You say, why I went and used ‘not impossible’, that is ‘negative’ form instead of ‘possible’, ‘positive’ form?
Because, there’s still many difficulties in this matter. At least, some of them had been pinned out by quantum physics:
In order to travel across time, one must accelerate the vessel to the point near (a friction) of speed of light. With that, the ‘time fabric’ around that vessel will be slowed (the ‘you will be younger than your twin bro in Earth’ crap), and ultimately, when the vessel EXCEEDS the speed of light, you will be able to travel freely, roaming time as your backyard…
…or so they say.
Breaking the continuum of time-space is not as easy as they predicted. Because the continuum itself has granted ‘Existence’.
Don’t know what I meant? Let me explain in less scientific way:
Imagine you have a clock. A working-well, ticking clock. What color, is not important; and analog is recommended.
When you opened the glass cover, and put your finger in the track of the ticking hand, what will happen?
It will stop. Yes, it may be still trying to tick, but your hand will block the way.
The same will happen with electrons, swirling inside of the atom. When they’re subjected to forced acceleration, they tends to gather the force as weight.
In other words, just as [Amrod] described, this weight made the atom-and ultimately matter that composed by them heavier. And this calls for more energy for propelling the vessel.
An unending loophole.
Yet, that is just one problem for the so-called ‘time explolers’. The second thing that matter is the rigidity of human bodies.
When subjected to acceleration equals to more than 2 times of Earth gravitation, most of people will pass out because of lack of blood supply to their brains. However, when trained (as in NASA’s astronauts) human body will tolerate up to 3 times G.
What will happen to human, when their body accelerated near the speed of light?
…let me calculate…the G will equals unending loophole of the gross weight of the vessel times the acceleration times….
…in short, human bodies-will end as a paste of organic matter after the process. That is, if the vessel itself still intact.
The atoms inside of a matter vibrates. And if subjected to external energy source, they will absorb it and vibrates more.
So what will happened when this atoms are given enough energy to shake off the link between them? Of course, the formation will break down. So will the vessel we’re using; even with the state-of-art shielding technique (of course, it is a different matter when you’re using photon—concentrated power of light—as the shield since they are just energy; they would not gain mass-or so I thought.)
Another way that had been made in attempt of time-traveling is to use blackholes: this sweet babes will draw you in near the speed of light, so you won’t need so much energy.
But the drawback is still the same: human bodies can’t hold that much acceleration. What’s more; the vessel will need extra power to escape the gravitional pull when you have succeeded to travel into past-at maximum, the time that blackhole was formed (you can’t go to the future using this method).
The last problem of the ‘time-traveling’ is the ‘Butterfly Effect’. Who knows what will happen in the future when some Geiger counter triggered the trap? Will the cat be killed, or not? Or what will happened when someone from the future assassinated Hitler?
Maybe, the Nazis will reign until now. Or they will nuke the earth, rendering it unhabitable.
Who knows? Even until now, human beings made parrarel universe when they’re choosing their socks: the black or the grey one? Which foot will I wear them first?
Yes, it is not impossible for humans to leap across the time. Maybe 200, maybe 300 years for now.
But now, we’re living in the ‘Present’. Not the Past, not the Future. Because the ‘Now’ we’re living in is determined by us. Weeping over Past or longing for unclear Future will lead us nowhere.
…at least, it is what my principle.
Due to the horrendous amount of paradoxes time travel of most sorts would cause I'd have to say I don't believe it's possible... unless time is not as linear and sequential as we believe, if it's a multidimensional, branching, no two places the same sort of thing like in "Noein", then yeh... what the hell, it may just work, not that it would really be that useful though... it wouldn't provide our lives with that much more meaning, would it?
I'd have said that time is an illusion (lunch time doubly so... if you're a Douglas Adams fan), there is only the present, the past is gone and unretrievable and the future is yet to come and pass.
I'd have said that time is an illusion (lunch time doubly so... if you're a Douglas Adams fan), there is only the present, the past is gone and unretrievable and the future is yet to come and pass.
#765052 Quote Report Edited by ~Social-Pariah 6 months 2 weeks ago
Not possible. It brakes the existence law of Sartre. Also, Maths and Physics would need to be reformulated, cause those rules are just not applicable on time traveling.
Another point is that we are biological beings, and every biological being needs time to live, to exist. When you touch time, you touch the existence of life.
Another point is that we are biological beings, and every biological being needs time to live, to exist. When you touch time, you touch the existence of life.
