__THISRES__100357.jpg "Trick or Treat by ~chanelqueen17 3 weeks 6 days ago")
Suggestions? Whines? help?
I'm not capping armies. If you guys want to stop, then stop, or be like Kalico and help out. I spent a few hours yesterday helping Yina find people, so I'll help too.
Shadow_dude, if you only want a six/seven man army, then go right ahead. Just, more than just you.
Shadow_dude, if you only want a six/seven man army, then go right ahead. Just, more than just you.
I recognized a flight of scars set in your eye - The Detachment Kit
Numbers cant always win a battle. I shall back that fact up by having the least people in my army out of all you guys! Not to mention the teams are unbalanced. MWUAHA! Beware of my TOTO!
#284648 Quote Report Edited by `Shadow-Dude 3 years 5 months ago
Ok done. new group set up.
invited most users.
invited most users.
Please visit my blog, go for the bashing, stay for the jokes.
Click this signature!
How about each Army have their own page or group?
>_>
>_>
^ to much work for that i think, but a hq-thread ore sompt would then be handy..
and how will the map look like? i think best would be somethin custom drawn fancy but i want isles and sea and stuff...
and how will the map look like? i think best would be somethin custom drawn fancy but i want isles and sea and stuff...
Threads'll be up when a few days before it starts. Kalico's already gone an made her own page, and I'm fixing to do one for us, so go ahead and do it.
I recognized a flight of scars set in your eye - The Detachment Kit
What about specialty? I mean, there are those who specialize in some stuffs while others don't and those who master more stuffs than the other. This said, I think there should be some kind of stat for each combatant including their special attack/stuffs.
As for the battleground, I think it will be great to have something like in Igo game board-kind of territory.
Don't mind me. Just mumbling out of nothing. XO
As for the battleground, I think it will be great to have something like in Igo game board-kind of territory.
Don't mind me. Just mumbling out of nothing. XO
Hello,
I was curious about the fact that we will be battling other people for "Land." I know we've established names for the groups of Warrior's but we haven't established a name for each groups land. Will each Warrior be given a piece of land to defend? Since we are sort of doing one on one battle anyways. I'm aware that we don't want to make things to complicated but I feel it would have more...feeling behind each battle.
A question about how battles are initiated. Will we be challenged directly in person here in the group or will we be challenged as a whole (entire group). Therefore allowing the group to decide who to go up against the challengers.
@ Shellova - You make a very interesting comment. I agree with you many levels actually. It would seem like a way of exploiting the others weakness. Which would make the Battleground all the more challenging. However each member would have to be put up to question at what they are good at. That could take a while as when I last checked there were quite a few people signed up in the competition. Interesting idea none the less. Thanks for sharing ^_^.
Have a nice day.
I was curious about the fact that we will be battling other people for "Land." I know we've established names for the groups of Warrior's but we haven't established a name for each groups land. Will each Warrior be given a piece of land to defend? Since we are sort of doing one on one battle anyways. I'm aware that we don't want to make things to complicated but I feel it would have more...feeling behind each battle.
A question about how battles are initiated. Will we be challenged directly in person here in the group or will we be challenged as a whole (entire group). Therefore allowing the group to decide who to go up against the challengers.
@ Shellova - You make a very interesting comment. I agree with you many levels actually. It would seem like a way of exploiting the others weakness. Which would make the Battleground all the more challenging. However each member would have to be put up to question at what they are good at. That could take a while as when I last checked there were quite a few people signed up in the competition. Interesting idea none the less. Thanks for sharing ^_^.
Have a nice day.
If you reveal what you are good at and what you are not (to your opponents, I mean), you are basically revealing your weakness.
The Q&A page states one-on-one is allowed but I believe the each army will get to chose its choice of candidate to be fielded. Else, I can basically pick on the weakest member in the opposing army and just pound away.
The Q&A page states one-on-one is allowed but I believe the each army will get to chose its choice of candidate to be fielded. Else, I can basically pick on the weakest member in the opposing army and just pound away.
Stating stats, etc. - There'll be no stats aside from wins and losses for each army.
Land - Each person gets the same size land to begin with. Its more about conquering than defending.
Challenges - Challenges are up to the challenger. If I wanted to battle kozu's army, I'd start a thread, state the Rules of War, and that'd be that. One on one fights won't be to win land, but to earn points, which'll come later when I figure it out a bit more. This is all a grey area right now, so just wait a bit.
Land - Each person gets the same size land to begin with. Its more about conquering than defending.
Challenges - Challenges are up to the challenger. If I wanted to battle kozu's army, I'd start a thread, state the Rules of War, and that'd be that. One on one fights won't be to win land, but to earn points, which'll come later when I figure it out a bit more. This is all a grey area right now, so just wait a bit.
I recognized a flight of scars set in your eye - The Detachment Kit
So I suppose there will be major battle for land and skirmishes along the border as such. It will be interesting that teams that don't share borders won't be able to fight. Example:
Team A || Team B || Team C
Team A can fight team B, and team B can fight team C while team A can't fight team C but it can after it takes team B's land.
Team A || Team B || Team C
Team A can fight team B, and team B can fight team C while team A can't fight team C but it can after it takes team B's land.
Will be an aillance or state of netural be possible?
3 years 5 months ago
I like that idea. But wouldn't really good teams stick together if that happens?
Unless one of the nation are planning to backstep their "allied" nation.
Well, that IS the point of a war, isn't it? Are we trying to make it as similar to wars as possible? It'd be quite interesting to have alliance, neutral and such. Good teams are most likely going to stick together and not try to attack each other until the end of the war.
I'll just ask, after conquering their land, would there be a choice to joining the conquerer's army? Like, if team A beat team B, can members of team B choose to go to team A?
I'll just ask, after conquering their land, would there be a choice to joining the conquerer's army? Like, if team A beat team B, can members of team B choose to go to team A?